Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-rss-aggregator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/inthedri/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131 News Archives - Page 3 of 4 - Deprecated: Function WP_Dependencies->add_data() was called with an argument that is deprecated since version 6.9.0! IE conditional comments are ignored by all supported browsers. in /home/inthedri/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Full-size SUVs remain a staple for families, road-trippers, and anyone needing a spacious, capable vehicle. But with an average price of over $80,000, choosing the right SUV is more important than ever.
According to a new study by iSeeCars, which analyzed prices and life expectancy of over 3.8 million new vehicles, some large SUVs offer significantly better long-term value than others. By comparing the purchase price to the expected lifespan, the study highlights the models that provide the most reliable years on the road for the least amount of money. Here’s what they found.
The Buick Enclave tops the list as the most reliable full-size SUV for the money, with an average price of $53,448 and an expected lifespan of 9.6 years. That translates to an annual cost of ownership of $5,555—well below the segment average of $7,888 per year. While it may not have the ruggedness of body-on-frame competitors, the Enclave’s refined ride and comfortable interior make it a solid choice for families prioritizing space and value.
2. Nissan Armada
2025 Nissan Armada Platinum Reserve and Pro-4X
Nissan
The Nissan Armada is a strong contender in the reliability rankings, with an average purchase price of $65,654 and a lifespan of 10.2 years. This brings its cost per year to $6,408, making it one of the better values among large, truck-based SUVs. Known for its power engine, spacious cabin, and towing capability, the Armada appeals to buyers who need durability without stretching their budget too far.
The Lexus LX 600 stands out with the longest expected lifespan of any full-size SUV in the study, clocking in at an impressive 16.4 years. That longevity helps offset its steep average price of $113,104, bringing its cost per year to $6,887—still below the segment average. Built on the same platform as the legendary Toyota Land Cruiser, the LX 600 combines luxury with serious off-road capability, making it a top pick for buyers who want a vehicle that will last well over a decade.
The Chevrolet Tahoe remains a go-to option for those seeking a reliable, full-size SUV. With a price of $73,574 and an expected lifespan of 10.5 years, the Tahoe’s cost per year comes out to $7,037. While that’s slightly higher than the top-ranked models, it’s still a solid figure for a vehicle known for its durability, strong resale value, and ability to handle everything from daily commutes to heavy towing.
Closely related to the Tahoe, the GMC Yukon offers similar reliability with an average lifespan of 10.9 years. However, with a higher price tag of $83,509, its annual cost of ownership rises to $7,645—just under the segment average. Buyers looking for a slightly more upscale experience than the Tahoe will find the Yukon an appealing option, but they’ll pay a premium for it.
Final thoughts
For buyers looking to maximize their investment in a full-size SUV, the Buick Enclave, Nissan Armada, and Lexus LX 600 offer the best balance of affordability and long-term dependability.
While vehicles like the Tahoe and Yukon remain strong choices, their higher annual costs make them slightly less attractive from a value standpoint. With full-size SUVs being some of the most expensive vehicles on the market, understanding which models will last the longest while costing the least over time can make all the difference in finding the best deal.
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!
Finding a full-size truck that balances cost, reliability, and durability can be a challenge. With vehicle prices on the rise and interest rates still high, buyers need trucks that offer the best long-term value. Thankfully, new research from iSeeCars, which analyzed prices and life expectancy of over 3.8 million new cars, has identified the full-size trucks that provide the best price per year of expected lifespan.
Whether you’re looking to purchase a truck for the first time or are just considering a switch, you’ll want to see how the options rank against each other.
The Toyota Tundra tops the list as the best-value full-size truck. With an average price of $61,794 and an expected lifespan of 15.6 years, it costs just $3,966 per year to own. Toyota’s reputation for reliability and durability holds strong, making the Tundra a solid choice for those looking for a truck that will last well beyond the average ownership period.
Coming in second is the Nissan Titan, priced at $58,080 with an expected lifespan of 13.1 years. Its price per year comes out to $4,447, making it a more cost-effective option than most other full-size trucks on the market.
The Chevrolet Silverado 1500 ranks third, with a slightly lower price tag of $57,872 but a shorter lifespan of 12.5 years. That results in a price per year of $4,637, still below the segment average.
4. GMC Sierra 1500
2025 GMC Sierra
GMC
GMC’s Sierra 1500 lands in fourth place with a price per year of $5,178. It costs more upfront at $65,909 but is expected to last 12.7 years. That puts it just above the segment average in terms of long-term value.
The Ford F-150, America’s best-selling truck, ranks fifth. Despite a relatively affordable list price of $59,584, its 11-year lifespan results in a price per year of $5,398, making it one of the pricier options when considering long-term value.
6. Ram 1500
2025 Ram 1500
Ram
Finally, the Ram 1500 takes the last spot on the list. With a price of $62,080 and a lifespan of 11.4 years, its price per year reaches $5,468—the highest among the six models. While it remains a popular option, it offers less value per year compared to its competitors.
Full-size trucks remain a popular choice for buyers who need durability, towing capacity, and long-term reliability. The Toyota Tundra leads the pack with the lowest cost per year of ownership, while the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and Nissan Titan offer lower average list prices compared to other options in the list.
Meanwhile, Ford and Ram’s strong brand appeal might not be enough to offset their higher costs over time. With careful research, truck buyers can find a model that delivers the best balance of cost, performance, and dependability for years to come.
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!
Cars nowadays offer a lot more than they used to: semi-autonomous driving, better fuel efficiency, and greater safety features, to name a few. But new research found that there’s one quality in short supply across the industry: dependability.
According to J.D. Power’s latest Vehicle Dependability Study, owners of 2022 vehicles have reported more problems than any group since 2009. The study, which surveyed owners of three-year-old cars, found that quality issues from the COVID-19 pandemic era are still lingering in vehicle production, even as the industry makes progress on other fronts.
The study surveyed 34,175 owners of 2022 model-year vehicles, measuring the number of problems per 100 cars. The results show a significant drop in quality compared to previous years, which is not entirely unexpected.
A mechanic prepares to do a tire rotation during an oil change at a Pep Boys – Manny Moe & Jack service center in Clarksville, Indiana, U.S., on Wednesday, June 3, 2015.
“While the increase in problems this year may be a thorn in the side of automakers and owners, it’s important to remember that today’s three-year-old vehicles were built during a time when the industry was grappling with major disruptions,” said Jason Norton, director of auto benchmarking at J.D. Power.
During the early 2020s, automakers faced factory closures, part shortages, and supply chain delays. This forced them to build cars under difficult conditions, and it appears those struggles are now showing up in long-term reliability ratings.
Software issues lead the list of complaints
The most common reliability issue reported? Problems with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity. These systems, which allow users to mirror their smartphone screens onto their car’s infotainment system, have been plagued by software bugs.
J.D. Power noted that while automakers promise fixes through over-the-air (OTA) updates, they don’t always work as intended. Of the owners surveyed, 36% said their car had received an OTA update, but only 30% saw an improvement. More than half (56%) reported no noticeable change after receiving an update.
Among different powertrain types, hybrid vehicles showed the fewest reported issues. Here’s how each category stacked up in terms of reported problems per 100 vehicles:
Hybrids: 199
Gas-powered vehicles: 200
Electric vehicles: 223
Diesel-powered vehicles: 233
Plug-in hybrids (PHEVs): 242
EV reliability is improving, with 33 fewer problems per 100 vehicles than in last year’s study. However, PHEVs saw a drop in quality, likely due to their complex dual powertrain system.
The 10 most dependable car brands
J.D. Power ranked car brands based on the number of problems per 100 vehicles. Here’s how the top 10 performed:
1. Lexus: 140 problems per 100 vehicles
2024 Lexus GX 550
Lexus
Lexus once again dominated the dependability study, cementing its reputation for long-term reliability. The brand’s best-performing model was the Lexus GX, which ranked as the most dependable midsize premium SUV.
2. Buick: 143 problems per 100 vehicles
Buick took second place, proving that General Motors’ premium brand knows how to build reliable vehicles. While no particular model ranked at the top of its category in reliability, the overall brand managed to make relatively dependable cars even in the midst of a pandemic.
Mazda continues to impress with simple yet durable engineering. Like Buick, none of Mazda’s vehicles ranked at the top of their respective categories, but the overall brand’s low number of reported problems still puts it among the best in the industry.
4. Toyota – 162 problems per 100 vehicles
Toyota’s reputation for reliability remains strong. The Toyota Camry, Corolla, Tacoma, and RAV4 all ranked as the most dependable vehicles in their respective segments.
5. Cadillac – 169 problems per 100 vehicles (tied)
2026 Cadillac LYRIQ-V
Cadillac
Cadillac tied for fifth place, showing that GM’s luxury brand is making strides in dependability. The Cadillac XT6 led the pack in the upper midsize premium SUV category.
5. Chevrolet – 169 problems per 100 Vehicles (tied)
Chevrolet also secured a fifth-place tie. Notably, the Chevrolet Silverado, Silverado HD, and Chevrolet Tahoe were ranked the most reliable in their respective segments.
GMC landed in sixth place, with the GMC Acadia named the most dependable upper midsize SUV. The brand’s focus on durability continues to pay off in long-term reliability.
7. Porsche – 186 problems per 100 vehicles
2025 Porsche Macan Electric
Porsche
Luxury performance brand Porsche showed strong dependability, proving that performance and complexity don’t always mean more problems.
8. BMW – 189 problems per 100 vehicles
BMW’s dependability ranking suggests that the brand is improving quality control, with the BMW 3 Series taking the top spot for the most reliable compact premium car.
9. Mini – 190 problems per 100 vehicles
Mini’s small cars have proven to be surprisingly durable. Although they can sometimes come at a premium, Mini remains a solid choice for drivers looking for a fun yet dependable vehicle.
10. Kia – 196 problems per 100 vehicles
2025 Kia K5
Kia
Kia rounded out the top 10, with the Kia Sedona winning the award for the most reliable minivan. Kia’s vehicles continue to improve in long-term quality.
At the other end of the rankings, some automakers fared much worse in the study, struggling with high numbers of reported issues. Volkswagen, Chrysler, Jeep, Audi, and Land Rover had the highest number of reported issues per 100 cars, between 270 and 285 across the brands.
2025 Volkswagen Tiguan R-Line
Volkswagen
Tesla was left out of J.D. Power’s official brand rankings due to the company’s policy of not allowing surveys to be conducted in a handful of states. However, the study still gathered data from owners in other states, showing that Tesla vehicles had 209 problems per 100 vehicles, slightly above the industry average.
Final thoughts
While some brands showed strong dependability, the overall industry average rose to 202 problems per 100 vehicles—12 more than last year.
It will be interesting to see whether future vehicle generations improve as supply chains face potential new threats from a wave of proposed tariffs thanks to the Trump administration. For now, buyers looking for long-term dependability may want to stick with brands like Lexus, Toyota, and Buick, which have consistently performed well in these rankings.
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!
The Ford F-150 is America’s favorite truck, a title it’s held for 48 years, and its favorite vehicle overall for 43 years. That popularity comes from its ability to be many things to many buyers. The F-150 is currently offered in XL, STX, XLT, Lariat, Tremor, King Ranch, and Platinum trim with a Regular, Super, or Crew Cab and a 5.5-foot, 6.5-foot, and 8-foot bed. From work truck to plaything, there’s an F-150 that’s right for you.
There’s also the battery-electric Lightning and high-performance Raptor, but those are different animals entirely and not addressed here.
Powertrain choices include a base 325-horsepower twin-turbocharged 2.7-liter V6, a 400-horsepower 5.0-liter V-8, a 400-horsepower twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6, or a 430-horsepower hybrid that employs a twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 and an electric motor. A ten-speed automatic transmission is standard for all.
When it comes time to yank something heavy, you’ll find the 400-hp twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 tows up to 13,500 pounds, 500 more than the 5.0-liter V-8. Even the hybrid can haul 12,700 pounds, and the payload tops out at 2,455 pounds.
Ford F-150 Platinum
Ford Motor Company
The cabin is filled with thoughtful touches, such as optional lie-flat front seats and a transmission lever that folds flat to create a workspace. There’s also an optional bed-mounted generator that provides 7.2 kW for powering tools or a flatscreen while tailgating. Changes for 2025 include a standard 12-inch infotainment display and two new options: Ford’s Blue Cruise semi-autonomous driving system and a head-up display.
Still, given that Ford’s reliability has slipped as of late, ranking in the bottom 10 of J.D. Power’s 2024 Reliability Index, you might want to consider some of these alternatives.
Ram 1500
With the top spot in J.D. Power’s Initial Quality Survey under its belt, Ram added a new flagship Tungsten trim for 2025, with a power tailgate, quilted-leather upholstery, massaging seats, suede headliner, a 14.5-inch touchscreen, 10.25-inch front passenger touchscreen, 12-inch instrument cluster, and a 23-speaker Klipsch stereo.
Available with either a Crew Cab and Quad Cab and a 5’7″ and 6’4″ bed, standard power comes from a 3.6-liter V-6 mated to a 48-volt hybrid system that generates 305 horsepower on the Tradesman, Tradesman HFE, and Big Horn/Lonestar trims.
Ram also offers a 3.0-liter Hurricane twin-turbocharged inline six-cylinder engine rated at 420 horsepower on the Tradesman, Warlock, Big Horn/Lone Star, Laramie, and Rebel trims, and a High Out Hurricane with 540 horsepower on the RHO, Limited, Limited Longhorn and Tungsten models. The Hemi V-8 has been dropped for 2025.
The 2025 Ram 1500 Tungsten’s lavish cabin.
Ram
Maximum towing falls short of the F-150 at 11,550 pounds as does payload at 2,370 pounds. Thankfully, it makes up for it in other respects. Consider its suspension, which uses coil springs rather than the leaf springs used by its competition. You can even opt for an air suspension and adjustable ride height. Either way, Ram delivers a smooth ride and powertrain refinement lacking elsewhere, while offering the plushest cab.
2025 Ram 1500 Tradesman
Ram
Ram also offers in-bed 110-volt outlets and an in-bed lockable toolbox. Uniquely, its 60/40 split-folding rear tailgate allows you to open one side or the other or fold it traditionally.
It all makes for quite an impressive rig and one that’s tough to beat.
Just ask GMC. The Sierra 1500 is basically a Chevrolet Silverado with slightly nicer trim and a modestly differentiated exterior design. Prices are higher too. A 79.4-inch bed is standard with the Regular, Double, or Crew Cab. A 69.9-inch box is available for the Crew Cab, and a 98.2-inch bed can be fitted to the Regular Cab.
2025 GMC Sierra Denali Ultimate
GMC
Engine choices start with a 310-horsepower 2.7-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, a 355-horsepower 5.3-liter V-8, a 420-horsepower 6.2-liter V-8, or, uniquely, a 305-horsepower 3.0-liter Duramax inline-six turbocharged diesel engine that generates 495 pound-feet of torque, the most of any Sierra 1500. An eight-speed automatic is standard with the four, while the others get a 10-speed.
The towing capacity tops out at 13,300 pounds, although even the base model can yank 9,500 pounds. Payload maxes out at 2,280 pounds.
Only GM offers a diesel engine option in a light duty full-size pickup: the 3.0-liter Duramax Diesel.
GMC
Like the Ram, the GMC has a trick tailgate that’s also offered on its Chevrolet sibling. Dubbed the MultiPro Tailgate, it has a secondary smaller panel within the tailgate that swings down fully to make reaching inside the bed easier. It also acts as a step into the bed or as a bed extender stop.
While nicer than a Silverado, the Sierra trails the Ram in the plushness department. Yet the Sierra’s advantage is that it feels smaller than its size suggests, with an agility and feel that make it a pleasure to drive. In this, it’s like a lot of GM vehicles: well-engineered with interior trim quality that trails the competition.
Chevrolet Silverado 1500
If the 2025 Chevrolet Silverado has any advantage over its GMC twin, it’s the greater option flexibility. Its powertrains mimic those of its sibling, as do its cabs, beds, payload, and towing.
However, it has a lower price, and as a result, overall trim quality has slightly deteriorated. This is a Chevrolet, after all.
Yet its handling is not significantly different from the GMC, so it merely comes down to a preference in dealer, design, and price. That last part is where Chevrolet holds an advantage: It has the lowest base price of any full-size pickup, starting at $36,800.
Notably, while the Ford F-150 is the bestselling pickup truck by brand, GM’s Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra—basically identical trucks—together outsold the Ford in 2024 by 874,679 units to 765,649 units. Neither GM truck has a clear advantage over the Ford except for its diesel option.
Toyota Tundra
With the Tundra, Toyota has yet to significantly challenge Detroit-based automakers when it comes to full-size pickups, although every iteration gets closer. The Tundra isn’t offered in a Regular Cab. Instead, you get a Double Cab with a 6.5-foot bed or an 8.1-foot bed or a larger CrewMax cab with a 5.5-foot bed or 6.5-foot bed.
New for 2025 are massaging seats and a power tailgate on all but base SR models. A TRD Rally Package enhances its off-road chops. Similar to the other trucks here, the Toyota Tundra has a 120-volt AC power outlet in the bed.
Power comes from either the base 389-horsepower “I-Force” twin-turbocharged V-6 or a 437-horsepower I-Force Max” twin-turbocharged Hybrid V-6 with an impressive 583 pound-feet of torque. A 10-speed automatic transmission is standard on all models.
The 2025 Toyota Tundra Capstone’s interior reflects its top-of-the-line status.
While its abilities trail its rivals, it should be satisfactory for most buyers, with a 12,000-pound maximum towing capacity and a 1,940-pound maximum payload. While the Hybrid returns 20-22 mpg in combined city/highway driving, that’s less than the Ford Hybrid’s 23 mpg, Ram HFE’s 23 mpg, and the GMC/Chevrolet diesel’s 23-26 mpg.
The Ford F-150 is built in Michigan and Missouri, while the Ram 1500 is manufactured in Michigan. The GMC Sierra 1500 is made in Indiana, while its sibling, the Chevrolet Silverado 1500, is fabricated in Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Mexico. The Toyota Tundra is assembled in Texas.
Final thoughts
2025 Ram 1500 Rebel
Ram
While the 2025 Ford F-150 wins in pure numbers, aka towing and payload, all full-size trucks offer enough capability for most buyers. So, in the end, aside from design, dealer, and price, the decision comes down to a truck’s other aspects to seal the deal. With Ram, it’s luxury and refinement, not to mention its in-bed toolbox. With GM, it’s the vehicle’s driving dynamics that prove superior. Finally, Toyota offers the promise of reliability for the Detroit-phobic.
But if we had to choose, the Ram 1500 would get our nod.
Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!
If you thought vehicles were already too expensive, you would not be a fan of the latest GMC price increase. The 2025 Terrain, with its new squared-off styling and redesigned interior, will start at $31,395 in FWD, which is a $1,300 increase over the previous model year. Adding all-wheel-drive hikes the price up by another $2,000, bringing the total to $33,395.
The higher-level AT4 and Denali will also get changes in 2026
2025 GMC Terrain Elevation
GMC
The base trim will also change from the SLE to the Elevation, which offers luxurious standard features such as a heated steering wheel, heated front seats, remote start, and adaptive cruise control. Redesigned versions of the AT4 and Denali will join the Elevation for the 2026 model year, but no new prices have been announced yet. Considering the Denali currently starts at $38,600, it’s likely to exceed $40,000 if the base trim’s price hike is any indication.
The GMC Terrain’s price increase does not mean a new powertrain
Despite the styling changes and price increase, the GMC Terrain’s powertrain remains the same. The small SUV is powered by a 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that puts out 175 hp and 203 lb-ft of torque in either front- or all-wheel drive. The transmission choices depend on the powertrain configuration, with the front-wheel-drive Terrain getting a CVT and the all-wheel drive getting an eight-speed automatic.
The price increase makes alternatives more attractive
The GMC Terrain’s sibling, the Chevrolet Equinox, is powered by the same 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with the same power output. It, too, can be equipped with front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive and the same transmission choices. The FWD Equinox starts at $29,995, while the AWD starts at $31,995. It even has the same heated seats and steering wheel as the Terrain.
That’s a $1,400 price increase for essentially the same car underneath. The styling of both cars is drastically different; however, the Equinox takes on a sharper, more modern vibe than the squared-off Terrain.
2025 Chevrolet Equinox
Chevrolet
Final thoughts
The price increase alone would have made the Terrain less desirable to most. However, compared to the package you get with the largely similar Equinox, it gets even worse.
The choice ultimately comes down to aesthetic preferences. If you’re after an SUV that looks a little tougher but has all of the modern amenities you’re accustomed to, go for the GMC Terrain. If you want an SUV that looks as modern as it is, get behind the wheel of a Chevy Equinox instead.
2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali brings big power and an equally big battery
Powering the 2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali is GM’s Ultium platform, which they have announced will be renamed soon. They estimate that in Max Power mode, the Sierra EV Denali puts out 760 hp and 785 lb-ft of torque with a 4.5 second 0-60 mph time.
A full charge provides a range of 440 miles, and with 800-volt DC fast charging at up to 350kW, GMC claims drivers can gain up to 100 miles of range in just 10 minutes of charging.
2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali Charging
GMC
The sizeable battery can also power your home for up to 21 days, provided that your daily energy consumption is lower than normal. The optional GM Accessories PowerBar+ also provides access to up to 10.2 kW of power for your equipment or tools when a standard electrical outlet isn’t available.
Sierra EV Denali sports an impressive towing capacity and extended bed
Towing should be a breeze thanks to its claimed 10,000 lb towing capacity. How much that will affect the range has not yet been disclosed. The Multipro Midgate extends the bed to a maximum length of 10′ 10″ when the rear seats are folded down and the rear window is removed, allowing you to haul more cargo. Given that it uses the same Ultium platform, the Sierra EV Denali inherits the 4-wheel steer and CrabWalk from the brand’s Hummer EV.
2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali Cabin
GMC
Luxurious cabin with plenty of upper-class amenities
The cabin houses the same 14” digital cluster and a 16.8-inch infotainment screen as the 2024 model. The interior surfaces are adorned with open-pore wood, a quilted pattern on the seats, and perforated accents on the doors. Overhead is an infrared and UV-coated panoramic glass roof for an “open-air ambiance.” All things considered, it looks like a pretty comfy place to be on long rides.
Working towards bridging the EV truck gap
2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali Cargo
GMC
The 2025 GMC Sierra EV Denali proves itself to be more than just a flashy badge. Yes, it’s an electric truck and yes, it starts pushing into six-figure territory, but you’re getting legitimate muscle to go along with that price tag. Its 10,000-lb towing capacity is no empty claim, and the sort of comfort and upscale detailing it brings to the segment were once found only in premium SUVs.
Yes, long-haul towing is still a challenge as EV infrastructure catches up, but the Sierra EV Denali demonstrates that we’re moving past the era where electrification meant compromising on real-world utility. As battery technology continues to evolve, the idea of a powerful, refined, and fully electric truck that won’t leave you stranded seems less like wishful thinking and more like the new normal.
Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or “Alexa, open Autoblog” to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives.
We’ve known for a while now that GMC and Chevy have been working on AT4 and Trail Boss versions of their respective Sierra EV and Silverado EV pickup trucks. But we’re getting our best look yet at them with these spy photos. They give us a better idea of what body changes there will be, as well as a close-up of the tires, giving us their size and type.
Some basics of off-road trim levels are obvious to spot. Both trucks feature bright red recovery hooks up front. But beyond that, there isn’t much different from the outside of either truck compared to the base examples of each. The front bumpers are basically the same profile as the base bumpers, with the exception of the recovery hooks. The Silverado has natural black plastic fender flares, whereas the GMC has body color examples with integrated marker lights. They both get the same standard side steps, and the rear bumpers also appear unchanged. Each of these is equipped with the MultiPro/Multi-Flex tailgate.
Really the biggest change appears to be in the wheels and tires. Each of them have unique designs, but they have the same dimensions. They’re 18-inch wheels with 285/75R18 tires. That comes out to just shy of 35 inches in diameter, a good size of tire for an off-roader — and note how it doesn’t even look all that large on such big trucks. Said tires are Goodyear Wrangler Territory AT all-terrains. The gas-powered trucks come with slightly narrower (275) mud-terrain versions as standard.
Both of these trucks should start somewhere below the range-topping first edition models the two brands are currently marketing to the public, which hover between $95,000 and $110,000 depending on specification. The Silverado WT does start at just under $80,000, and we would expect the Trail Boss and the Sierra EV AT4 to come in somewhere above that, possibly between $85,000 and $90,000. Specifications are a mystery. It seems likely that at least the Silverado will get the WT’s dual motors with 510 horsepower and 615 pound-feet of torque. The GMC could potentially get the more powerful motors making 754 horsepower and 785 pound-feet of torque as a way to differentiate itself, though this is speculation. The 204-kWh battery pack is probable, though there are rumors that at least GMC is going to start offering a smaller, more affordable 170-kWh pack that could be an option. We’ll hopefully know all this in the near future, since both trucks look close to being ready.
The only full hybrid in the segment, available PowerBoost™ provides targeted best-in-class horsepower and torque, a projected EPA-estimated range of approximately over 700 miles on a single tank of gas and at least 12,000 pounds of maximum available towing capacity. ItÕs available across the lineup from XL to Limited.
Used cars have had ups and downs in pricing over the past few years, but they remain a generally solid alternative to paying new MSRPs. Letting someone else eat the depreciation can net buyers a great deal, but that’s only if the used car they’re buying is reliable and in good condition. Consumer Reports recently ranked the used cars to avoid with an eye on reliability and maintenance costs, and some automakers have several models on the list.
Consumer Reports came up with 60 vehicles based on responses from its annual member surveys.
Used cars to avoid in 2024
Audi
A3: 2018
A6: 2019
Q3: 2016, 2022
E-tron: 2019
Even if the model you’re searching for isn’t on this list, it’s always a great idea to get a pre-purchase inspection before buying. A reputable third-party inspection can help identify existing issues and may find potential problems that could crop up down the road. Spending a few hundred dollars up front could save thousands down the road, so don’t slack on your research when shopping for used cars.
As technology advances, electric cars are improving their fast-charging times. That means less time spent waiting at a DC public charger when you’re out on the road. While Level 3 chargers used to provide a maximum of 150 kilowatts of power, 350-kW chargers are become more common, making for super-fast charging … if your car is capable of taking advantage of it. So how do automakers improve the charging speed of their EV batteries? Some are turning to higher voltage, specifically 800V charging.
What’s the difference between 800-volt charging and 400-volt charging?
So how does 800V charging improve upon the more common 400V EVs? Put simply, the higher the voltage, the less amperage (current) it requires to charge. In other words, with more voltage, you get more wattage (power, aka charge rate) from the same amperage (current).
800V architecture is also more efficient, with less electrical resistance, so it can use thinner cables and smaller, lighter components while needing less cooling. The tradeoff is that it is more costly, and guess who that cost gets passed on to. While automakers don’t break down their pricing to show how much more you’re paying for that 800V system, you’ll just have to evaluate any potential purchases as a whole, and make your decision based on overall pricing of the vehicle. Thankfully, the 800V EVs on sale now are generally ones we like.
Now, 800V charging capability doesn’t necessarily mean an EV has 800V vehicle architecture. For instance, the GMC Hummer EV and Chevy Silverado EV operate at 400V, but with their dual battery packs, can switch to 800V when charging by temporarily connecting those packs in series.
Currently, there are only a handful of EVs available with 800V charging. But if you are going to find yourself taking longer trips in your EV and using DC fast chargers more often, you might want to consider choosing one with this faster charging capability. With that in mind, these are the EVs available with 800V charging, either on sale now or coming in 2024.
